• KOSPI 2812.05 +41.21 +1.49%
  • KOSDAQ 756.23 +6.02 +0.80%
  • KOSPI200 376.54 +6.64 +1.80%
  • USD/KRW 1373 3.00 -0.22%
Proxy voting rises in South Korea, but few vetoes cast
Shareholder activism

Proxy voting rises in South Korea, but few vetoes cast

Many asset managers fail to comply with disclosure guidelines, top financial regulator says

By

Jun 05, 2025 (Gmt+09:00)

3 Min read
News+
(Courtesy of Getty Images)
(Courtesy of Getty Images)

An increasing number of asset management firms in South Korea are more frequently exercising their voting rights at portfolio companies. Nevertheless, they rarely oppose those companies’ proposed agendas, data shows.

The regulatory Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) said on Wednesday that the rate of asset managers’ proxy voting at shareholder meetings stood at 91.6% in the period from April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025.

Of the votes, only 6.8% were cast against the companies' proposed agendas.

The data is based on an analysis of 273 asset management firms operating in South Korea on 28,969 proposed agenda items at shareholder meetings during the period.

That compares with year-earlier figures of a 79.6% voting rate and an objection rate of 5.2%, according to the FSS.

In January, the NPS voted in favor of Korea Zinc's top management when embroiled in a management dispute with an MBK-led group (Courtesy of Getty Images)
In January, the NPS voted in favor of Korea Zinc's top management when embroiled in a management dispute with an MBK-led group (Courtesy of Getty Images)

South Korea's major pension funds, such as the National Pension Service (NPS) and the Government Employees Pension Service (GEPS), are more active in exercising their voting rights than asset management firms.

During the period from April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, the NPS, the world’s No. 3 pension scheme, recorded a participation rate of 99.6% and an objection rate of 20.8% at domestic companies' shareholder meetings, while the GEPS reported rates of 97.8% and 8.9%, respectively.

The agenda items asset managers vetoed most frequently were corporate reorganization, such as mergers and spin-offs (26 cases, 21.5%); amendments to the articles of association (286 cases, 9.0%); and appointment and dismissal of board members (789 cases, 7.9%).

Proxy voting rises in South Korea, but few vetoes cast

PUBLIC DISCLOSURES

A review of voting disclosures found that 72 out of 273 asset management firms, or 26.4, fell short in offering detailed explanations for more than half of their proxy items, often using phrases like “limited impact on shareholder meetings” or “no violation of shareholder rights.”

A substantial number of them also failed to comply with disclosure guidelines and reporting format requirements, the financial watchdog said in a statement.

DILIGENT FIDUCIARIES

By asset manager, Mirae Asset Global Investments Co., Trust Asset Management Co. and Shinyoung Asset Management Co. received relatively positive ratings.

Mirae Asset scored highly on the participation and objection rates, which came to 99.3% and 16.0%, respectively. The firm also provided detailed explanations for its voting decisions.

In January, the NPS voted in favor of Korea Zinc's top management when embroiled in a management dispute with an MBK-led group (Courtesy of Getty Images)
(Courtesy of Getty Images)

Despite its smaller size, Kyobo AXA Asset Management operates a dedicated team for proxy voting and provides clear, guideline-based explanations for its voting decisions. The firm recorded a participation rate of 97.4% and an objection rate of 16.1%.

Truston Asset Management and Shinyoung Asset Management actively engaged in shareholder rights processes, including meetings with management and submitting shareholder proposals. Their proxy voting participation rates were also high at 100% and 98.8%, respectively.

By contrast, Korea Investment Management Co. and KB Asset Management Co. scored low in providing explanations for their voting decisions.

Meanwhile, many private equity fund management firms failed to comply with proxy right disclosure deadlines, said the FSS.

The financial regulator said that it will introduce a comparative disclosure system for fund proxy voting to help investors identify diligent fiduciaries, while improving stewardship code practices in reference to global standards.

Write to Seok-Cheol Choi at dolsoi@hankyung.com

Yeonhee Kim edited this article.
More To Read
Comment

0/300